Category Archives: Poetry

The Cocoon

The Cocoon

By Robert Frost

As far as I can see this autumn haze
That spreading in the evening air both ways,
Makes the new moon look anything but new,
And pours the elm-tree meadow full of blue,
Is all the smoke from one poor house alone
With but one chimney it can call its own;
So close it will not light an early light,
Keeping its life so close and out of sight
No one for hours has set a foot outdoors
So much as to take care of evening chores.
The inmates may be lonely women-folk.
I want to tell them that with all this smoke
They prudently are spinning their cocoon
And anchoring it to an earth and moon
From which no winter gale can hope to blow it,—
Spinning their own cocoon did they but know it.

About the Poem

There is a difference between loneliness and solitude, though from the outside they can look very much the same. Frost’s speaker sees a small, isolated house at dusk. No lamp has been lit, no one has come outside, and even the evening chores appear to have been neglected. He imagines that the people inside—perhaps “lonely women-folk”—have withdrawn from the world.

Yet the chimney tells another story. The house may be quiet and its inhabitants hidden, but there is a fire burning within. Its smoke does not simply rise and disappear; it spreads across the evening sky, softening the new moon and filling the meadow with blue. Something produced by one poor and seemingly insignificant house transforms the entire landscape.

That image changes the meaning of the house’s isolation. The people within are not merely shutting themselves away. Without realizing it, they are “spinning their cocoon,” creating a place of warmth and protection against the winter soon to come. The cocoon is delicate, but Frost imagines it anchored to both earth and moon so securely that no winter gale can carry it away.

We often speak of withdrawing into ourselves as though it were always unhealthy. Sometimes it is. Loneliness can become its own kind of winter, especially when we feel forgotten or disconnected from the lives continuing beyond our walls. However, there are also times when retreat is necessary. We need places where we can close the door, kindle a fire, and shelter ourselves from what is cold and exhausting outside.

A cocoon is not merely a hiding place. It is where a living thing protects itself while undergoing a transformation. From the outside, nothing may appear to be happening. Inside, however, life is quietly preparing for what comes next. Rest and solitude are not always signs that we have stopped living; sometimes they are how we gather the strength to begin again.

Perhaps the most comforting part of the poem is that the people inside the house do not realize what they have created. “Did they but know it,” Frost writes. We may not always recognize the warmth, safety, and resilience of the small life we have built for ourselves. We may see only four walls and feel that the world has passed us by. Someone looking from a distance, however, might see our chimney smoke spreading across the sky—a quiet sign that there is still warmth within us and that our small lives touch more of the world than we know.

“The Cocoon” is composed of sixteen lines arranged in eight rhyming couplets. Frost’s steady meter and paired rhymes give the poem a feeling of enclosure: each line is joined to another, much as the house and its inhabitants are wrapped within the cocoon of smoke.

The poem also gradually expands its scale. It begins with an autumn haze spread across the evening sky, then traces that haze back to the chimney of a single house. Having narrowed our attention from the sky to the home, Frost expands the image once more. The smoke connects this otherwise isolated dwelling to the meadow, the earth, and even the moon. What initially appears small and lonely becomes part of something immense.

The cocoon metaphor also contains a subtle promise. Winter is approaching, but a cocoon suggests that winter will not last forever. Within its shelter lies the possibility of survival, transformation, and eventual emergence.

“The Cocoon” was first published in The New Republic in February 1927 and later included in Frost’s 1928 collection West-Running Brook.

About the Poet

Robert Frost was born on March 26, 1874, in San Francisco. Following his father’s death in 1885, Frost moved with his mother and sister to Lawrence, Massachusetts. Although born in California, he became closely associated with rural New England, whose farms, forests, villages, and changing seasons provided the settings for much of his poetry.

Frost attended both Dartmouth College and Harvard University but did not earn a degree. Over the years, he worked as a teacher, farmer, cobbler, and newspaper editor while continuing to write poetry. In 1912, he moved with his family to England, where his first two collections, A Boy’s Will and North of Boston, were published. By the time he returned to the United States in 1915, he had established the literary reputation that would make him one of America’s best-known poets.

Although Frost often used traditional meter, rhyme, rural settings, and conversational language, his poems are rarely as simple or comforting as they first appear. Beneath their familiar landscapes are questions about isolation, grief, human relationships, mortality, and our uncertain place in the natural world. He received four Pulitzer Prizes for poetry and served as Consultant in Poetry to the Library of Congress from 1958 to 1959. Frost lived and taught for many years in both Massachusetts and Vermont. He died in Boston on January 29, 1963.


Unknowing

Unknowing

Traditional Bektashi

Unknowing
And knowing nothing of unknowing,
They spread.
Flee.

Unknowing
And knowing nothing of unknowing,
They seek.
Teach them.

Unknowing
And knowing nothing of unknowing,
They sleep.
Wake them.

Knowing,
And knowing unknowing,
The silent few become one with the Core.
Approach.

About the Poem

I came across this poem in a somewhat unusual place. I have been listening to Jason Goodwin’s The Janissary Tree, a historical mystery set in Istanbul in 1836. The novel’s protagonist, Yashim, encounters these words in connection with the Janissaries and the Bektashi dervishes who had long been associated with them. The poem caught my attention immediately, particularly those final words: “Knowing, / And knowing unknowing.”

At first, “knowing unknowing” sounds like a contradiction. How can we know and not know at the same time? Yet perhaps one of the greatest signs of wisdom is knowing the limits of our own knowledge.

The poem seems to describe different kinds of ignorance. There are those who do not know and do not even realize that they do not know. Some confidently spread their ignorance, and the poem tells us to flee from them. Others recognize enough to seek understanding, and we should teach them. Still others remain asleep to what they do not understand, and we should try to wake them.

But the final group is different. They know, yet they also know “unknowing.” They have acquired knowledge without acquiring the arrogance of believing that they can know everything. Instead of speaking loudly and confidently, they are “the silent few.” They recognize that some things remain beyond them.

What fascinates me is how often this same idea appears in very different religious and philosophical traditions.

In Daoism, the Dao De Jing repeatedly warns against mistaking our understanding of reality for reality itself. Its famous opening tells us that the Way that can be completely expressed is not the eternal Way. Chapter 71 makes the connection with Unknowing even clearer: wisdom lies in recognizing what we do not know. The person who does not know but believes that he knows has a far greater problem.

The ancient Greek philosopher Socrates arrived at something similar. The wisdom attributed to him was not that he knew everything, but that he understood the limits of what he knew. Recognizing our ignorance becomes the beginning of wisdom rather than its opposite.

Christianity has its own tradition of unknowing. In 1 Corinthians 13:12, Paul writes, “For now we see through a glass, darkly.” He continues by acknowledging, “now I know in part.” We see only a reflection of the whole. Our knowledge is real, but it is incomplete.

Centuries later, an anonymous Christian mystic would write The Cloud of Unknowing, arguing that God cannot ultimately be grasped by human intellect alone. Faith sometimes requires us to enter the mystery rather than conquer it.

Islam likewise recognizes the limitations of human knowledge. God may know all things, but human beings do not. Even the familiar phrase inshallah—“if God wills”—contains an acknowledgment that we do not know what tomorrow will bring. We can plan, hope, believe, and act while recognizing that the future remains beyond our knowledge.

None of these traditions are saying that knowledge is bad. Neither is Unknowing. Notice that the poem does not praise ignorance. Those who seek should be taught; those who sleep should be awakened. We should learn. We should question. We should seek truth.

But knowledge should bring humility with it.

Perhaps the danger comes when we stop recognizing the distinction between what we know, what we believe, what we think we know, and what remains unknowable. Certainty can be comforting, especially in religion, politics, and our understanding of other people. It is also very easy to mistake certainty for truth.

The wisest person in Unknowing is not the person who loudly announces that he has discovered all the answers. The wisest are “the silent few” who have learned enough to understand how much remains beyond their understanding.

There will always be things we cannot know. We cannot know exactly what tomorrow will bring. We cannot completely know another person’s heart. We cannot fully understand why some things happen to us. And no matter how deeply we believe in God, none of us can comprehend the entirety of the divine.

Perhaps that is not something we need to overcome.

Perhaps true wisdom is not merely knowing.

It is knowing unknowing.

Unknowing is associated with the Bektashi tradition, a Sufi order historically centered in Anatolia and the Balkans. Its author is unknown, and the precise origins of the poem are difficult to establish. The version above appears on Anthony Weir’s website, The Bektashi Order of Dervishes. I have not been able to locate an original Turkish or Ottoman Turkish text from which this English version was translated, so I have attributed it simply as “Traditional Bektashi” rather than assigning it to a particular poet.

The poem’s appearance in The Janissary Tree is particularly appropriate because of the close historical relationship between the Bektashi order and the Ottoman Janissaries.

The Janissaries were the elite infantry corps of the Ottoman Empire and, for centuries, among the most powerful institutions in the empire. Their origins were unusual. Beginning in the fourteenth century, the Ottomans used a system known as the devşirme, or “collection,” through which Christian communities in the Balkans were required to surrender boys to the Ottoman state as a form of tribute. The boys were converted to Islam, educated, and trained for service to the sultan. Some entered the imperial administration, while others became Janissaries.

Technically, the Janissaries were slaves of the sultan, but the word “slave” can be misleading to modern readers. They were not slaves in the sense of plantation or domestic slavery familiar from American history. As members of the sultan’s household, they could receive salaries, enjoy considerable privileges, and rise to positions of wealth, status, and enormous political influence. Their lack of traditional family or tribal loyalties was originally intended to ensure that their loyalty belonged directly to the sultan.

Over the centuries, however, the Janissaries evolved from an elite military corps into a powerful political force capable of making and unmaking sultans. They also developed a particularly close spiritual association with the Bektashi order of dervishes. When Sultan Mahmud II violently abolished the Janissaries in 1826, an event known as the Auspicious Incident, he subsequently suppressed the Bektashis as well, closing many of their lodges and driving adherents underground. Since The Janissary Tree takes place only ten years later, that history hangs heavily over the story.

The poem itself reflects a central concern of mystical traditions: the difference between possessing knowledge and understanding the limits of knowledge. Its progression leads from ignorance without awareness, through seeking and awakening, and finally to “knowing unknowing”—a state in which knowledge is accompanied by humility before what cannot be fully understood.

About the Bektashi Tradition

The Bektashi order is a Sufi mystical tradition traditionally associated with Hacı Bektaş Veli, a thirteenth-century holy man from Anatolia. Over the centuries, Bektashism developed a distinctive religious tradition incorporating Sufi mysticism alongside elements associated with Shi’a Islam and particular reverence for Ali and the Twelve Imams.

Bektashi spirituality has often emphasized an inward search for divine truth rather than relying solely upon outward religious observance. This sometimes placed Bektashis at odds with the more orthodox Sunni religious establishment of the Ottoman Empire.

Their close association with the Janissaries made that tension political as well as religious. When Sultan Mahmud II destroyed the Janissary corps in 1826, the Bektashis lost their powerful protectors and were themselves subjected to official suppression. Nevertheless, the tradition survived, particularly in Albania and elsewhere in the Balkans.

That history adds another dimension to Unknowing. Religious institutions can sometimes be very certain about what they know. Mystics, by contrast, have often reminded us that approaching God can mean confronting something far greater than the human mind can fully understand.

And perhaps that is why the poem’s final instruction is not learn, teach, or even know.

It is simply:

Approach.


I Am Much Too Alone in This World, Yet Not Alone

I Am Much Too Alone in This World, Yet Not Alone

By Rainer Maria Rilke

I am much too alone in this world, yet not alone
    enough
to truly consecrate the hour.
I am much too small in this world, yet not small
    enough
to be to you just object and thing,
dark and smart.
I want my free will and want it accompanying
the path which leads to action;
and want during times that beg questions,
where something is up,
to be among those in the know,
or else be alone.

I want to mirror your image to its fullest perfection,
never be blind or too old
to uphold your weighty wavering reflection.
I want to unfold.
Nowhere I wish to stay crooked, bent;
for there I would be dishonest, untrue.
I want my conscience to be
true before you;
want to describe myself like a picture I observed
for a long time, one close up,
like a new word I learned and embraced,
like the everday jug,
like my mother’s face,
like a ship that carried me along
through the deadliest storm.

About the Poem

There is a particular kind of loneliness that comes not from having no one around us, but from never quite feeling that we are completely known. Rainer Maria Rilke captures that contradiction in the very first line: “I am much too alone in this world, yet not alone enough.” We can feel isolated while simultaneously longing for the solitude necessary to understand ourselves.

That tension runs throughout the poem. Rilke wants independence—“my free will”—but he also wants connection. He wants to be involved in the world, to be “among those in the know,” yet he is willing to choose solitude rather than belong somewhere at the cost of himself. There is something powerful in that distinction. Being alone can hurt, but being surrounded by people while unable to be who we truly are can sometimes feel even lonelier.

Perhaps that is why the second half of the poem speaks to me most strongly. Rilke writes, “I want to unfold.” It is such a simple phrase, yet it says so much. We spend much of our lives unfolding, slowly discovering who we are beneath the expectations placed upon us by family, society, religion, work, and even ourselves. Sometimes we bend ourselves into shapes we think others will find acceptable. Rilke rejects that: “Nowhere I wish to stay crooked, bent; / for there I would be dishonest, untrue.”

There comes a point when we have to stop contorting ourselves merely to fit into the spaces others have made for us. That does not mean refusing to grow or change. Quite the opposite. Rilke wants to unfold, to become more fully himself. There is a difference between changing because we are growing and changing because we are afraid that our authentic selves will not be accepted.

The poem ends with the desire to know and describe oneself as intimately as the familiar things that become almost inseparable from our lives: an everyday jug, a mother’s face, a ship that carried us safely through a terrible storm. Self-knowledge does not arrive all at once. We learn ourselves slowly, through observation and experience, through mistakes and questions, through love and loss, and sometimes through loneliness.

Maybe we are all, in one way or another, still unfolding. We may never understand ourselves perfectly, but perhaps the important thing is that we continue trying to live with a conscience that is true—to others, certainly, but also to ourselves.

“I Am Much Too Alone in This World, Yet Not Alone” explores several themes that recur throughout Rainer Maria Rilke’s poetry: solitude, identity, self-knowledge, freedom, and the complicated relationship between the individual and the larger world.

The poem is built around contradictions. The speaker is too alone, but not alone enough; too small, but not small enough. He wants freedom but also participation. He wants to remain himself while reflecting something greater than himself. Rather than resolving these tensions, Rilke allows them to coexist, suggesting that becoming fully ourselves often requires learning to live within such contradictions.

The poem changes noticeably with the declaration, “I want to unfold.” From that point forward, the speaker’s concern becomes authenticity. He does not want to remain “crooked” or “bent,” because doing so would make him dishonest. Instead, he seeks a clear understanding of himself, something familiar and recognizable even amid uncertainty.

The final image of a ship surviving “the deadliest storm” gives the poem a quiet sense of endurance. Identity is not merely something we discover by looking inward; it is also shaped by everything that has carried us through the storms of our lives.

About the Poet

Rainer Maria Rilke was born René Karl Wilhelm Johann Josef Maria Rilke in Prague on December 4, 1875, when the city was part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. The name by which we know him came later. In 1897, he met the writer and intellectual Lou Andreas-Salomé, who became his lover, mentor, and eventually lifelong confidante. She disliked René, considering it too affected and insufficiently masculine, and encouraged him to adopt the more distinctly German Rainer. The change was part of a larger transformation under her influence: Rilke altered his handwriting, simplified his poetic style, and began developing the voice that would define his mature work. From his collection of given names, he retained Maria, becoming Rainer Maria Rilke.

Rilke traveled extensively throughout Europe and spent significant periods in places including Russia, Paris, Germany, Italy, and Switzerland. His encounters with artists, writers, landscapes, and different cultures profoundly influenced his work. In Paris, he worked for a time as secretary to the sculptor Auguste Rodin, whose intense attention to physical objects helped influence Rilke’s own approach to observation and poetry.

Among Rilke’s best-known works are The Book of Hours, The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge, Duino Elegies, and Sonnets to Orpheus. His Letters to a Young Poet, a collection of letters written to aspiring poet Franz Xaver Kappus, has also become one of his most widely read works. In those letters, as in much of his poetry, Rilke returned repeatedly to solitude—not simply as loneliness, but as a space in which a person can learn, create, question, and become.

Rilke died of leukemia in Switzerland on December 29, 1926, at the age of fifty-one. A century later, his poetry continues to resonate because the questions he asked remain familiar: Who am I? How do I remain true to myself? How do I love others without losing myself? And how do I learn to be alone without being consumed by loneliness?


The Human Seasons

The Human Seasons

By John Keats

Four Seasons fill the measure of the year;
    There are four seasons in the mind of man:
He has his lusty Spring, when fancy clear
    Takes in all beauty with an easy span:
He has his Summer, when luxuriously
    Spring’s honied cud of youthful thought he loves
To ruminate, and by such dreaming high
    Is nearest unto heaven: quiet coves
His soul has in its Autumn, when his wings
    He furleth close; contented so to look
On mists in idleness—to let fair things
    Pass by unheeded as a threshold brook.
                He has his Winter too of pale misfeature,
                Or else he would forego his mortal nature.

About the Poem

We often speak of life as a journey, but John Keats imagines it as something more cyclical and familiar: the changing seasons. Within every human life—and perhaps within every human heart—there is a spring, summer, autumn, and winter.

Spring is the season of discovery. Everything seems fresh, beauty is easily found, and possibility stretches in every direction. Summer takes those early impressions and lingers over them. It is a season of fullness, when we savor our experiences, revisit our dreams, and allow ourselves to believe we might reach something close to heaven.

Then comes autumn. The restless wings begin to fold. We become less determined to chase every beautiful thing and more willing simply to watch as life passes before us. Keats does not portray this as bitterness or defeat. There is contentment in it—a quiet acceptance that we do not have to possess every pleasure or follow every path. Some things may pass us “as a threshold brook,” noticed but undisturbed.

Finally, there is winter, when age, loss, illness, and mortality become harder to ignore. Keats gives winter only two lines, but they carry the weight of the entire poem. Winter may not have spring’s excitement, summer’s abundance, or autumn’s tranquility, but it is part of being human. Without it, we would “forego” our mortal nature; we would cease to be the fragile, temporary creatures we are.

Although Keats presents these seasons as stages of a lifetime, I think we experience all four many times. A single year can contain new beginnings, periods of abundance, moments of withdrawal, and stretches of cold uncertainty. Sometimes they can all occur within the same week. We may feel young and hopeful in one part of our lives while experiencing winter in another.

Perhaps the comfort of the metaphor is that no season is unnatural. We should not expect ourselves always to be blossoming or producing. There are times for growth and times for rest, times to spread our wings and times to fold them close. Each season belongs to us, and each has something to teach us about what it means to live.

“The Human Seasons” is a fourteen-line sonnet built around an extended metaphor comparing the four seasons of the year to the stages of human life and the changing states of the human mind. Keats wrote the poem in 1818 and included it in a letter to his close friend Benjamin Bailey.

The sonnet follows a largely Shakespearean rhyme scheme, moving through three quatrains before concluding with a rhyming couplet. Each of the first three seasons receives several lines of rich imagery, while winter is compressed into the final two. This sudden brevity reflects winter’s starkness and brings the poem directly to its central truth: mortality is an unavoidable part of human nature.

Spring represents youth, imagination, and an effortless receptiveness to beauty. In summer, the mind “ruminates” on the experiences gathered during spring. Keats’s unusual phrase “Spring’s honied cud” compares thought to something slowly and pleasurably savored. The image may not sound particularly elegant to modern ears, but it suggests the mind nourishing itself by returning again and again to youthful dreams.

Autumn brings stillness. The soul folds its wings and becomes content to observe rather than pursue. The “mists in idleness” anticipate the lush seasonal imagery Keats would later develop more fully in his celebrated ode “To Autumn.” Winter, however, offers no comforting imagery. Its “pale misfeature” suggests age, physical decline, and death. Yet Keats does not treat winter as an error in the cycle. It is precisely what makes us mortal—and therefore human.

About the Poet

John Keats was born in London on October 31, 1795. After losing both parents while still young, he trained as an apothecary and surgeon but ultimately abandoned medicine to devote himself to poetry. He became one of the major poets of the English Romantic movement, although his literary career lasted only a few years.

Keats’s poetry is known for its sensuous imagery, emotional intensity, and meditations on beauty, imagination, nature, love, and mortality. His best-known works include “Ode to a Nightingale,” “Ode on a Grecian Urn,” “La Belle Dame sans Merci,” and “To Autumn.”

During his lifetime, Keats endured harsh criticism and achieved little of the recognition he would receive after his death. He also suffered profound personal losses and failing health. After developing tuberculosis, he traveled to Italy in hopes that its warmer climate might help him recover. He died in Rome on February 23, 1821, at only twenty-five years old.

Knowing how short Keats’s life would be gives “The Human Seasons” added poignancy. He wrote knowingly about life’s winter even though he himself would scarcely have time to pass beyond its spring. Yet in that brief spring, he created poetry that has endured through generations, allowing his thoughts on beauty and mortality to outlive the mortal life from which they came.


August Moonrise

August Moonrise

By Sara Teasdale

The sun was gone, and the moon was coming
Over the blue Connecticut hills;
The west was rosy, the east was flushed,
And over my head the swallows rushed
This way and that, with changeful wills.
I heard them twitter and watched them dart
Now together and now apart
Like dark petals blown from a tree;
The maples stamped against the west
Were black and stately and full of rest,
And the hazy orange moon grew up
And slowly changed to yellow gold
While the hills were darkened, fold on fold
To a deeper blue than a flower could hold.
Down the hill I went, and then
I forgot the ways of men,
For night-scents, heady, and damp and cool
Wakened ecstasy in me
On the brink of a shining pool.

O Beauty, out of many a cup
You have made me drunk and wild
Ever since I was a child,
But when have I been sure as now
That no bitterness can bend
And no sorrow wholly bow
One who loves you to the end?
And though I must give my breath
And my laughter all to death,
And my eyes through which joy came,
And my heart, a wavering flame;
If all must leave me and go back
Along a blind and fearful track
So that you can make anew,
Fusing with intenser fire,
Something nearer your desire;
If my soul must go alone
Through a cold infinity,
Or even if it vanish, too,
Beauty, I have worshipped you.

Let this single hour atone
For the theft of all of me.

About the Poem

There is something about an August evening that already seems to carry the faintest suggestion of an ending. Summer is still very much with us, but the days are growing shorter. Darkness comes a little earlier than it did only a few weeks before. There may still be hot afternoons ahead, but occasionally there is a coolness in the evening air that reminds us autumn is not so far away.

Sara Teasdale captures one of those evenings in “August Moonrise,” but what begins as a beautiful description of the natural world gradually becomes something much more profound. She watches the sun disappear, the moon rise over the hills, and swallows dart across the evening sky. The colors deepen from rosy pink to orange, gold, and finally a blue so intense that it is “deeper…than a flower could hold.”

For a moment, everything else disappears.

“Down the hill I went, and then / I forgot the ways of men,” she writes. I love that line. There are moments when we need to forget the ways of men for a little while. The world can be exhausting. People disappoint us. We disappoint ourselves. There are worries about tomorrow and regrets about yesterday. Sometimes we need an evening when the air is cool, the moon is rising, and the rest of the world can simply wait.

But Teasdale does not remain in that peaceful landscape. The beauty surrounding her makes her think about something much larger: the fact that she will eventually lose everything.

Her breath. Her laughter. Her sight. Her heart. Perhaps even her soul.

That sounds bleak, yet “August Moonrise” does not feel like a poem of despair. Teasdale knows that sorrow is unavoidable, but she refuses to believe that sorrow negates beauty. She writes:

“no bitterness can bend
And no sorrow wholly bow
One who loves you to the end”

There is tremendous hope in those words—not the hope that nothing bad will happen, but the knowledge that pain does not erase every beautiful thing that came before it.

We sometimes think happiness means reaching a place where nothing hurts anymore. Life rarely works that way. Joy and sorrow have an inconvenient habit of existing beside one another. We can grieve someone we have lost and still laugh at a memory of them. We can carry disappointment and still be stopped in our tracks by a beautiful sunset. We can have no idea what tomorrow will bring and still enjoy the moon rising tonight.

Perhaps that is enough.

Teasdale ends with two remarkable lines:

“Let this single hour atone
For the theft of all of me.”

Everything will eventually be taken from her, but she has had this hour. She has seen the moon rise. She has smelled the damp evening air. She has watched swallows crossing the sky. She has experienced beauty so completely that, for this moment at least, simply having been alive to witness it makes the eventual price of mortality seem worth paying.

We cannot hold on to an August evening forever. We cannot hold on to summer. We cannot hold on to youth, the people we love, or ultimately even life itself. Perhaps that is precisely why we should pay attention while they are here.

There will always be another worry waiting for us tomorrow. Tonight, perhaps, we can look up at the moon.

“August Moonrise” begins almost as a landscape painting. Teasdale establishes the scene through color and movement: blue Connecticut hills, a rosy western sky, darting swallows, black maples, an orange moon turning to gold, and hills deepening into blue.

Her imagery is unusually vivid, but it is not static. Everything is changing. The sun has already disappeared. The moon is rising. The swallows move unpredictably through the sky. Colors shift as daylight gives way to darkness. Even before Teasdale explicitly introduces mortality, she has created a world defined by transition.

The swallows are particularly effective. Teasdale compares them to “dark petals blown from a tree.” Petals are beautiful, but fallen petals also suggest impermanence. They have separated from the flower that produced them and are being carried away. The image quietly anticipates the poem’s later concern with everything that must eventually “leave me and go back.”

The poem’s major transition occurs with the lines:

“Down the hill I went, and then
I forgot the ways of men”

Until this point, the speaker has primarily been an observer. Now she enters into communion with the landscape. The “night-scents, heady, and damp and cool” awaken an almost ecstatic response. Beauty is no longer merely something she sees; it becomes something she experiences physically and spiritually.

Teasdale then directly addresses Beauty itself. By capitalizing the word, she transforms beauty from a quality into something approaching a divine presence. She has been “drunk and wild” on Beauty since childhood. The language resembles religious devotion, and by the poem’s end she explicitly declares, “Beauty, I have worshipped you.”

Yet her worship does not promise immortality. Teasdale entertains several possibilities for what follows death. Perhaps the individual is somehow remade into something new. Perhaps the soul continues alone through “a cold infinity.” Perhaps the soul itself simply vanishes.

She does not claim to know.

That uncertainty is important. The poem’s consolation does not depend upon certainty about an afterlife. Whatever awaits her—or does not await her—she knows that she has experienced beauty while she was alive.

This gives particular force to the final couplet. The “theft” is mortality itself: everything life gives us will eventually be reclaimed. Yet Teasdale asks that this one perfect hour of beauty “atone” for that loss.

It is an extraordinary exchange. One hour cannot literally compensate for death, of course. But poetry is not concerned with balancing an account. Teasdale is expressing the immense value of being fully present for even one moment of existence.

The poem therefore becomes less about death than about how to live in its presence. Mortality gives urgency to beauty. Because the moon will set, we should watch it rise. Because August will end, we should notice its evenings. Because our lives are finite, the moments when we truly see the world around us matter all the more.

About the Poet

Sara Teasdale was born in St. Louis, Missouri, in 1884 and became one of the most popular American lyric poets of the early twentieth century. Her poetry is known for its musical quality, emotional clarity, and frequent attention to love, beauty, nature, solitude, and mortality.

Her first collection, Sonnets to Duse and Other Poems, appeared in 1907, followed by Helen of Troy and Other Poems in 1911. Her 1917 collection Love Songs received major recognition, including what is now regarded as an early form of the Pulitzer Prize for poetry.

Although Teasdale’s poems often appear deceptively simple, their accessible language can conceal considerable emotional complexity. She frequently places moments of natural beauty beside loneliness, longing, loss, or an awareness of death. Rather than diminishing beauty, however, mortality often seems to intensify it. What is temporary becomes precious precisely because it cannot remain.

Teasdale died in New York City in 1933 at the age of forty-eight. Her poetry has endured in part because of her ability to express enormous emotions without elaborate language. She could take something as ordinary as watching the moon rise over distant hills and transform it into a meditation on beauty, sorrow, mortality, and what makes a life worth living.

In “August Moonrise,” she leaves us with a simple challenge: notice what is beautiful while it is still before us. Summer will end. The moon will set. Every perfect hour eventually passes.

But first, we get to experience it.


The More Loving One

The More Loving One

By W. H. Auden

Looking up at the stars, I know quite well
That, for all they care, I can go to hell,
But on earth indifference is the least
We have to dread from man or beast.

How should we like it were stars to burn
With a passion for us we could not return?
If equal affection cannot be,
Let the more loving one be me.

Admirer as I think I am
Of stars that do not give a damn,
I cannot, now I see them, say
I missed one terribly all day.

Were all stars to disappear or die,
I should learn to look at an empty sky
And feel its total dark sublime,
Though this might take me a little time.

About the Poem 

Most of us have, at one time or another, loved someone more than they loved us. It may have been a crush that was never returned, a relationship that slowly faded, or simply an admiration that remained one-sided. Those experiences can leave us feeling embarrassed or even foolish, as though loving deeply were somehow a weakness.

W. H. Auden offers a different perspective.

He imagines the stars as beautiful, distant, and completely indifferent to us. They neither know nor care that we spend our nights gazing at them. Yet we continue to marvel at their beauty. We do not expect the stars to love us in return. So why should we believe that every human affection must always be perfectly balanced?

The heart of the poem is one of the most beautiful lines Auden ever wrote:

“If equal affection cannot be, / Let the more loving one be me.”

At first glance, it sounds almost heartbreaking. But I don’t think Auden is encouraging us to become doormats or to remain trapped in unhealthy relationships. Instead, he is recognizing that love is never a competition to see who gives exactly fifty percent. Love is a gift freely offered. If we only choose to love when we are guaranteed an equal return, then our love is really a transaction.

As a gay man, I also hear something else in these words. For many LGBTQ+ people, especially those of earlier generations, first loves often existed only in silence. We admired classmates, coworkers, neighbors, or friends who never knew how we felt—or who could never return those feelings. Loving from a distance was, for many of us, a painful but familiar experience.

Yet those loves were not meaningless simply because they were unreturned. They helped shape us. They taught us compassion, patience, and empathy. They prepared us for the day when we would finally find someone capable of loving us back.

The final stanza reminds us that even if the stars disappeared, life would go on. We would grieve their loss, but eventually we would learn to appreciate even an empty sky. Healing does not erase love. It teaches us that our capacity to love survives disappointment.

The greatest risk in life is not loving too much. It is allowing disappointment to convince us never to love again.

“The More Loving One” was first published in W. H. Auden’s 1957 collection Homage to Clio. Like much of Auden’s later poetry, it combines philosophical reflection with conversational language. Rather than writing a traditional romantic poem, Auden uses the stars as an extended metaphor for beauty, admiration, and emotional imbalance.

The poem asks whether love must always be reciprocal to have value. Auden ultimately suggests that it does not. Loving another person—even when that love is not fully returned—is not a failure but an expression of generosity and humanity.

The final stanza shifts from longing to acceptance. The speaker acknowledges that loss would be painful but also believes that the human heart possesses an extraordinary capacity to heal and continue finding beauty in the world.

About the Poet

W. H. Auden (1907–1973) was one of the most influential English-language poets of the twentieth century. Born in England, he later became an American citizen and wrote extensively on love, faith, politics, psychology, and the human condition. His poetry ranges from highly intellectual meditations to deeply personal reflections, often blending formal structure with everyday speech.

Auden was also one of the most prominent openly gay literary figures of his era. Although society often forced LGBTQ+ people into secrecy during much of his lifetime, his experiences informed many of his reflections on love, longing, intimacy, and belonging. His longtime relationship with poet Chester Kallman was complex but enduring, and themes of imperfect love frequently appear throughout his later work.

More than fifty years after his death, Auden’s poetry continues to speak to readers because it embraces life’s ambiguities. Rather than offering easy answers, he reminds us that love is worthwhile not because it is always returned, but because it reveals the very best of what it means to be human.


Shall I Compare Thee to a Summer’s Day?

Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day? (Sonnet 18)
By William Shakespeare

Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day?
Thou art more lovely and more temperate:
Rough winds do shake the darling buds of May,
And summer’s lease hath all too short a date:
Sometime too hot the eye of heaven shines,
And often is his gold complexion dimm’d;
And every fair from fair sometime declines,
By chance or nature’s changing course untrimm’d;
But thy eternal summer shall not fade,
Nor lose possession of that fair thou owest;
Nor shall Death brag thou wander’st in his shade,
When in eternal lines to time thou growest:
So long as men can breathe or eyes can see,
So long lives this, and this gives life to thee.

About the Poem

One of the things I genuinely loved teaching back when I was in high school education (or, as I sometimes jokingly say, “back when I worked in Hell”) was poetry—especially sonnets. There was something satisfying about helping students discover that poetry wasn’t just old words on a page but something living and surprisingly relatable.

Whenever we reached Shakespeare’s Sonnet 18, I would take my students outside on one of Alabama’s hot, bright spring days. Standing in the sunshine, they could immediately understand why Shakespeare says a summer’s day is “too short,” why “the eye of heaven” sometimes shines too fiercely, and why every beautiful thing eventually fades. The poem became much more than an assignment. The weather itself became part of the lesson.

At first glance, this appears to be a simple love poem. The speaker considers comparing his beloved to a beautiful summer day, only to reject the comparison almost immediately. Summer, after all, is imperfect. It can be windy. It can be unbearably hot. Clouds hide the sun. The season is brief, and eventually it gives way to autumn.

The beloved, however, is presented as surpassing all of those imperfections.

Of course, Shakespeare knew that human beauty is just as temporary as summer. None of us escape aging, illness, or death. The remarkable twist comes in the final couplet. The beloved’s beauty becomes eternal—not because the body remains young forever, but because the poem itself preserves it. Every time someone reads these fourteen lines, the beloved lives again.

There’s something wonderfully hopeful in that idea. We all want to leave something behind that outlasts us. For Shakespeare, poetry was a way to defy time itself. More than four hundred years later, we’re still reading these lines. In a sense, he proved his own point.

As someone who has always loved literature, I find that comforting. Words have an incredible ability to preserve moments, memories, and even people long after they’re gone. Whether through poetry, letters, journals, or even a daily blog, writing can become its own kind of immortality.

Sonnet 18 is one of the 154 sonnets written by William Shakespeare and was first published in 1609. It is perhaps the best-known sonnet in the English language and is often the first Shakespearean poem students encounter.

The poem follows the structure of a Shakespearean (or English) sonnet: three quatrains followed by a concluding couplet. Its rhyme scheme is ABAB CDCD EFEF GG, and it is written in iambic pentameter, giving it the steady, musical rhythm that makes Shakespeare’s verse so memorable.

The poem explores themes of beauty, love, mortality, and the enduring power of art. While many love poems celebrate physical beauty, Shakespeare ultimately argues that beauty can survive through poetry long after nature has taken its inevitable course.

Although the identity of the poem’s subject remains uncertain, the sonnet continues to resonate because its message is universal. We all long for beauty, cherish those we love, and hope that something of us will remain after we’re gone.

About the Poet

William Shakespeare (1564–1616) is widely regarded as the greatest writer in the English language. Born in Stratford-upon-Avon, England, he became an actor, playwright, and poet whose influence continues to shape literature, theater, and popular culture around the world.

Shakespeare wrote approximately thirty-nine plays, 154 sonnets, and several longer narrative poems. His works span tragedy, comedy, history, and romance, producing unforgettable plays such as Hamlet, Macbeth, Romeo and Juliet, King Lear, and A Midsummer Night’s Dream.

His sonnets explore themes of love, friendship, beauty, jealousy, time, mortality, and the power of poetry. Sonnet 18 remains his most celebrated because it captures, in just fourteen lines, one of humanity’s deepest hopes—that love and beauty might somehow endure beyond the limits of time.

More than four centuries after his death, Shakespeare’s works continue to be read, performed, quoted, and taught. Few writers have ever demonstrated more convincingly that words can outlive the people who write them.


Still Life with Rose

Still Life with Rose
By Richard Scott

Like a foreskin being pulled back, the damask
reveals – pelvic bowl of pink-fringed shadow,
dense sweet-meat bloom, coral’d cave, puce
empyrean with no vanishing point, planetary blush!
So let me in – where everything is new-born
and crystalline, paused and protected – into that other
world, that high-shine place of safety, arranged
and sparking up like a bower. Almost every day,
for some moments, I think about him – the black
stems, thorns that can prick so deeply, whorl
of serrated leaves, all just beneath, around – still
gorgeousness – your petal’d cumulus, your constancy –
helps me live. O rose keep on stunning for me –
for all us boys who have been ruined by men.

About the Poem

There are poems that ask to be understood, and there are poems that ask to be felt. Richard Scott’s “Still Life with Rose” is one of the latter. Its opening image is intentionally startling, forcing the reader to look beyond conventional ideas of beauty. Rather than presenting the rose as a delicate symbol of romance, Scott reveals it as something deeply physical, vulnerable, and alive.

As the poem unfolds, the rose becomes more than a flower. It becomes a place of refuge. The speaker longs to enter “that other world” where everything is “new-born and crystalline,” a sanctuary untouched by violence or betrayal. Yet the rose is not without danger. Its black stems and sharp thorns remind us that beauty and pain often grow from the same branch.

The final line transforms the entire poem: “O rose keep on stunning for me – for all us boys who have been ruined by men.” Suddenly, this is not simply a poem about a flower. It is about survival. It is about finding something beautiful that remains constant after trust has been broken. The rose cannot undo the wounds of the past, but it offers a reminder that beauty, tenderness, and hope still exist.

As a gay man, I find this ending especially moving. Many LGBTQ+ people carry scars left by rejection, abuse, shame, or relationships that wounded more than they healed. Scott does not pretend those experiences disappear. Instead, he offers the rose as an act of quiet resistance. To continue finding beauty in the world after being hurt is itself a form of courage.

The poem also reminds me that healing rarely happens all at once. We often return to the same sources of comfort day after day—a flower, a favorite place, a piece of music, a work of art, or the love of a trusted friend. These small moments of beauty become the things that help us live.

“Still Life with Rose” comes from Richard Scott’s acclaimed collection Soho (2018). Like many poems in the collection, it blends the sensual with the emotional, using vivid imagery to explore memory, desire, masculinity, trauma, and resilience. Scott frequently challenges traditional poetic representations of the male experience, offering instead an honest exploration of vulnerability and healing. The rose, one of poetry’s oldest symbols, is transformed here into something both deeply intimate and profoundly restorative.

About the Poet

Richard Scott is a British poet originally from London. His debut collection, Soho, received widespread critical acclaim and was shortlisted for several major literary awards, including the T. S. Eliot Prize. His poetry is known for its lush imagery, emotional honesty, and exploration of queer identity, love, grief, and the lasting effects of trauma. Scott’s work often reimagines familiar symbols and religious or artistic traditions through a contemporary LGBTQ+ perspective, creating poems that are both intellectually rich and deeply human.


Le Chat (The Cat)

Today is Bastille Day, France’s national holiday, so it seemed fitting to feature one of the country’s greatest poets. Charles Baudelaire’s Les Fleurs du Mal (The Flowers of Evil) forever changed modern poetry, exploring beauty, desire, melancholy, and the mysteries hidden within everyday life.

Of all the poems in that remarkable collection, I chose “Le Chat” (“The Cat”). Anyone who has followed this blog for long knows why. Isabella has ruled my home—and my heart—for the past ten years. Although Baudelaire’s cat becomes a bridge to thoughts of the woman he loves, I recognize something equally familiar: the quiet companionship of a black cat, whose gaze seems to understand more than words ever could.

Le Chat

By Charles Baudelaire

Viens, mon beau chat, sur mon coeur amoureux;
Retiens les griffes de ta patte,
Et laisse-moi plonger dans tes beaux yeux,
Mêlés de métal et d’agate.

Lorsque mes doigts caressent à loisir
Ta tête et ton dos élastique,
Et que ma main s’enivre du plaisir
De palper ton corps électrique,

Je vois ma femme en esprit. Son regard,
Comme le tien, aimable bête
Profond et froid, coupe et fend comme un dard,

Et, des pieds jusques à la tête,
Un air subtil, un dangereux parfum
Nagent autour de son corps brun.

The Cat

— Translated by William Aggeler (1954)

Come, superb cat, to my amorous heart;
Hold back the talons of your paws,
Let me gaze into your beautiful eyes
Of metal and agate.

When my fingers leisurely caress you,
Your head and your elastic back,
And when my hand tingles with the pleasure
Of feeling your electric body,

In spirit I see my woman. Her gaze
Like your own, amiable beast,
Profound and cold, cuts and cleaves like a dart,

And, from her head down to her feet,
A subtle air, a dangerous perfume
Floats about her dusky body.

About the Poem

Anyone who has shared life with a cat—especially a black cat—knows that Baudelaire captures something almost impossible to describe. Cats are affectionate without being dependent, mysterious without being distant. They offer companionship on their own terms, and somehow that makes their affection all the more meaningful.

Reading this poem, I cannot help but think of Isabella. She is never very far away from me. Whether she’s sleeping nearby, watching me work, or demanding breakfast before dawn, she has a way of making her presence known without ever asking to be the center of attention. Like Baudelaire’s cat, her eyes seem to hold a depth that invites contemplation.

Of course, Baudelaire uses the cat as a doorway to thoughts of the woman he loved, Jeanne Duval, whose beauty he often portrayed as both captivating and dangerous. My own thoughts travel a different path. Isabella reminds me not of romance but of comfort, companionship, and the quiet routines that make a house feel like a home. Her soft purrs, her curious nature, and even her stubborn independence have become part of the rhythm of my daily life.

Perhaps that is one reason cats have fascinated artists, poets, and writers for centuries. They remain wonderfully unknowable. We may share our lives with them for years, yet they always retain a little mystery. On this Bastille Day, it seems fitting to celebrate not only one of France’s greatest poets but also the timeless fascination with these remarkable creatures—especially one little black cat who has made my own life immeasurably richer.

“Le Chat” first appeared in Les Fleurs du Mal, published in 1857. The collection shocked many readers of its day and was even prosecuted for offending public morality. Six of its poems were censored in France, and that ban remained in place for nearly one hundred years. Today, however, Les Fleurs du Mal is recognized as one of the foundational works of modern French poetry.

In this sonnet, Baudelaire blends sensual imagery with psychological symbolism. The cat is not merely a pet but a living symbol of elegance, mystery, beauty, and quiet power. Its eyes, described as a mixture of metal and agate, suggest something both precious and impenetrable. As the speaker strokes the cat, his thoughts naturally drift toward the woman he loves, whose beauty shares the same irresistible yet dangerous qualities.

The poem also demonstrates Baudelaire’s remarkable ability to move effortlessly between physical sensation and emotional reflection. What begins as the simple act of petting a cat becomes a meditation on attraction, memory, and desire. Like much of Les Fleurs du Mal, the poem finds extraordinary meaning in an ordinary moment.

About the Poet

Charles Baudelaire (1821–1867) was one of France’s most influential poets, critics, and translators and is widely regarded as one of the founders of literary modernism. His masterpiece, Les Fleurs du Mal, challenged conventional ideas about beauty by finding poetry in melancholy, urban life, longing, sensuality, and even moral ambiguity.

Although the collection was controversial when it was first published, Baudelaire’s influence on literature has been immense. His work inspired later poets such as Paul Verlaine, Arthur Rimbaud, Stéphane Mallarmé, and, beyond France, writers including T. S. Eliot. Today he is celebrated as one of the greatest poets in the French language, whose exploration of beauty, longing, and the complexities of the human spirit continues to resonate with readers around the world.


Shall I Compare Thee to a Summer’s Day?

Shall I Compare Thee to a Summer’s Day?

By William Shakespeare

Sonnet 18

Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day?
Thou art more lovely and more temperate:
Rough winds do shake the darling buds of May,
And summer’s lease hath all too short a date:
Sometime too hot the eye of heaven shines,
And often is his gold complexion dimm’d;
And every fair from fair sometime declines,
By chance or nature’s changing course untrimm’d;
But thy eternal summer shall not fade,
Nor lose possession of that fair thou owest;
Nor shall Death brag thou wander’st in his shade,
When in eternal lines to time thou growest:
So long as men can breathe or eyes can see,
So long lives this, and this gives life to thee.


About the Poem

If I had to choose a favorite sonnet, it would be this one. I have loved Sonnet 18 since I was a student, and it became one of my favorite poems to teach. It is one of those rare works that is both beautifully written and remarkably accessible. Even readers who are intimidated by Shakespeare often find themselves drawn into its simple but profound central idea.

Most people remember the opening line, “Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day?” But the poem is not really about comparing someone to summer. In fact, Shakespeare quickly argues that summer is an inadequate comparison. Summer is unpredictable. It can be too hot, too windy, or too brief. Every beautiful thing eventually fades.

The person addressed in the poem, however, will not.

Of course, Shakespeare does not mean that his beloved will never grow old or die. Instead, he makes a bold claim about the power of poetry itself. Through these “eternal lines,” the beloved’s beauty is preserved. As long as people continue to read the poem, the beloved continues to live in the imagination of each new generation.

There is also another reason this sonnet has remained meaningful to many LGBTQ+ readers. Although Shakespeare never identifies the beloved’s gender within the poem itself, Sonnet 18 is part of the collection commonly known as the Fair Youth sequence. These sonnets are addressed to a young man, making them among the most famous expressions of affection between men in English literature. Whether one interprets them as romantic, platonic, or deliberately ambiguous, they remind us that love, admiration, and beauty have always existed in many forms throughout history.

More than four hundred years later, Shakespeare’s prediction has proven true. Countless generations have read these lines, memorized them, taught them, and fallen in love with them. His beloved remains immortal—not because time stood still, but because great art can outlast time itself.

Sonnet 18 was first published in 1609 as part of Shakespeare’s collection of 154 sonnets. It is written in the traditional Shakespearean sonnet form: fourteen lines of iambic pentameter with the rhyme scheme ABAB CDCD EFEF GG.

The poem begins as a comparison between the beloved and a summer’s day but quickly overturns the comparison by arguing that nature’s beauty is temporary. The closing couplet delivers one of the most famous conclusions in English literature, asserting that poetry grants a kind of immortality by preserving beauty across generations.

Today, Sonnet 18 remains one of the best-known and most frequently taught poems in the English language.


About the Poet

William Shakespeare is widely regarded as one of the greatest writers in the English language. Born in 1564 in Stratford-upon-Avon, he wrote approximately thirty-nine plays, 154 sonnets, and several narrative poems.

His works explore timeless themes of love, ambition, jealousy, forgiveness, mortality, and the complexity of human nature. Four centuries after his death, Shakespeare’s plays continue to be performed around the world, and his poetry remains a cornerstone of English literature.

The sonnets, in particular, have inspired generations of readers because of their emotional depth and enduring questions about beauty, love, time, and memory. Among them, Sonnet 18 stands as perhaps the clearest expression of Shakespeare’s belief that while human life is fleeting, great poetry has the power to preserve what we cherish long after we are gone.